Thoughts on "The Big Bang" (not the TV show)

If the universe is expanding infinitely and some believe that it is a finite entity, how can both be true?

The Big Bang that so many taut as Truth with mathmatical proofs to back them up and quantum this and thats which are in fact still only theories --I propose this thought.

The universe expands itself to a point where it meets resistance. It did that before there was a Big Bang. The Point of Resistance gets stronger as more and more pressure is put against it. Galaxies get into a traffic jam, black holes begin to swallow more than they can spew, as soon as one particle of this massive cosmic creation peeks through the Point of Resistance, its like the single sperm breaking through the membrane of the ova. But it opens Pandoras Box and all that pressurized, angry, galactic stress is released into a larger allbeit, unknown realm in which it continues to expand.

The idea that there is expansion and contraction cycles, as though breathing is also relevant and to be considered. However, those actions can be done within the expansion realm I described.
That is, the space child can breath within this universe and the universe itself can throb. But continue to expand until it reaches the Point of Resistance.

There is a Native American story and an ancient Star Trek that depicts two brothers in eternal struggle. Two opposing forces, born of the same source (?) locked in a conflict, for should one of them win --the annhilation of the universe as we know it would take place. To the Native Amerian they are two parts of our psyche. Our humane nature and our animalistic nature and since we are both ...they are in conflict all through our individual existence. To the Star Trek writers, they were matter and anti-matter and if anti-matter won... well... there ya go! It is not clear what would happen if 'matter' won. Something ELSE to think about.